Monday, May 21, 2012

You are here: Home > Go Kart Racing > Dalhousie – Air Powered Go Kart

Dalhousie – Air Powered Go Kart

by admin on July 7, 2010

Awesome Air Powered go kart. 43km/h Top speed, Electronic timing, Mechanical Clutch, Competive performance. See the project from start to finish including lots of test videos. GET MORE INFO AT: poisson.me.dal.ca

{ 25 comments… read them below or add one }

IceDragon387 June 20, 2008 at 4:35 am

i was thinking about this all today. if you ran a line from the exhaust to a pressure regulator with a one way check valve, when the exhaust air gets to a certain psi you could push it back into the bottle. then you would have a never ending supply of presurized air….if not then you may need to throw an accumulator into the mix. but being as the engine shouldnt remove to much psi you should be able to reuse the exhaust

davespencer001 June 20, 2008 at 1:23 pm

Its not quite that easy to get air back in the tanks. The air would have to be at higher pressure then the tanks in order to get it back in. The tanks start at 3000 psi and we run air through the engine at 145psi. This means that the exhaust can be no more then 145psi. We would have to pump the exhaust air back up to pressure. Therefore it is of no benefit to put the exhaust back in the tanks. We do use a recirculation loop. We reworked the engine to use two of the three chambers for power.

IceDragon387 June 20, 2008 at 3:35 pm

interesting.. though i still beleive theres away to get it back in at the proper psi, my mind keeps going back to the high powered hydraulic brake systems that use a storage tank and an accumulator to store i beleive about 5000psi of pressure. i will have to consult my old teacher on the system and compressed air with it. though i dont see why its not possible since mercedes was doing it with vaccum on their old 300D deisel cars.

rentoz June 22, 2008 at 10:24 am

Nice one! What’s the name of the track used at beginning of the video?
BTW did you notify Guy Negre? I am sure he’ ll love this.

ORIF9 June 24, 2008 at 4:47 pm

I have 2 oddball questions…What’s the decibel rating on the engine and how long does it last?

Mega thanx ahead of time for your response.

^_^

P.S. Keep up the awesome work!!!

davespencer001 June 25, 2008 at 2:16 am

We do not have the decibel rating however it would be similar to a small motorcycle. We could easily reduce this and increase the power of the engine as well. We used an old snowmobile engine for the project with one rotor. If we used a multi-stage step down with increasing rotor sizes. We could extract much more power per air vol. This multi-stage step down technology is used in steam engines in the late 1800’s. It was purely budget that kept us from doing this. We currently get about 5 min.

ORIF9 June 25, 2008 at 5:21 am

Still, either way…I think you did an AWESOME JOB!!!! ^_^

davespencer001 June 25, 2008 at 10:16 am

Thanks!

spark300c August 11, 2008 at 7:31 pm

what is the range on that thing?

tayb0987 August 14, 2008 at 9:46 pm

very coll great job1!!!!

fizzguts August 15, 2008 at 9:56 pm

Maximum of 3.5 miles if the numbers in the comments and intro are correct

fizzguts August 28, 2008 at 5:19 am

Quote “If we used a multi-stage step down with increasing rotor sizes. We could extract much more power per air vol. This multi-stage step down technology is used in steam engines in the late 1800’s”
Nope
You misunderstand compound, triple expansion etc steam engines. Multi expansion steam engines work due to superheat and exhausting to a vacuum and the efficiency increase is in the 20 to 40% range over single expansion. Does not apply to air expansion.

oldtilter October 24, 2008 at 1:27 am

Nice Job!..Alternative vehicles are allways interesting

superfunnyman123 January 22, 2009 at 4:06 am

That is Great!!! very nice job!

sh3lbot February 22, 2009 at 8:13 pm

air powered rotary :D i love you guys! can you build a air powered 4 rotor ;)

landon303 March 3, 2009 at 8:23 pm

fukin seals fuk em who cares

localdu March 7, 2009 at 10:24 pm

looks like a wankel rotary. cool.

NikolayTrotsenko June 17, 2009 at 8:33 am

Hi.
Question why you are using only the standard ports of the intake and output.
It is sensible to make in the stator, two more windows, with a rotation of 180 degrees.
Considering the video did not saw any

07hottie0 July 3, 2009 at 9:17 pm

whare is the indoor track??????? (what city)

davespencer001 July 3, 2009 at 10:03 pm

Were not actually using the standard ports. We made a new exhaust port and are using the ignition and suction chambers for forward thrust. The compression chamber is now the exhaust. We could have optimized the chamber positions however we didn’t have the budget to fully rework the engine.

davespencer001 July 3, 2009 at 10:07 pm

Nope. It does apply. The rate of expansion effects the energy absorption of the air. That is why a pressurized vessel gets cold when you open it quickly.

fizzguts July 3, 2009 at 11:26 pm

Only if the rate of expansion allows your heat source in your case the atmoshere to transfer sufficient energy to counter the cooling due to expansion. At the rate you are using the supply this is minimal as the cylinder are where the cooling occurs even multi staging does not give you sufficient heat transfer area to make a, your words “major difference”. Even in the theoretical idea case you are looking at maybe 40% better performance which is still just an interesting toy exercise

ufoengines September 29, 2009 at 5:05 pm

Really nice job!
If you want a real HOOT check our my “Tesla Turbine Go Kart” and my “Leaf Blower Powered Go Kart” videos.

What do you guys thing of using a turbine in and air car power train with and multi speed trans. or and electro mechanical trans. ?

RevanantGod September 30, 2009 at 1:46 am

it is

door2doorman March 24, 2010 at 4:44 pm

great presentation!

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: